<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The manager that&#8217;s never there</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottberkun.com/blog/2006/the-manager-thats-never-around/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottberkun.com/blog/2006/the-manager-thats-never-around/</link>
	<description>Management and Creative Thinking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:58:47 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: randomthoughts &#187; Wise words</title>
		<link>http://www.scottberkun.com/blog/2006/the-manager-thats-never-around/comment-page-1/#comment-21183</link>
		<dc:creator>randomthoughts &#187; Wise words</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 00:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottberkun.com/blog/?p=218#comment-21183</guid>
		<description>[...] Wise words   Tags: Quality, management, productivity Monday, March 20th, 2006  To work 70 hours is a statement of work, not of progress. For every idiot working 70 hours thereâ€™s a smarter, wiser man whoâ€™s doing the same amount of work in 50 because heâ€™s paying more attention to results than the clock. Iâ€™d rather be, and rather hire, that man. Source (via) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wise words   Tags: Quality, management, productivity Monday, March 20th, 2006  To work 70 hours is a statement of work, not of progress. For every idiot working 70 hours thereâ€™s a smarter, wiser man whoâ€™s doing the same amount of work in 50 because heâ€™s paying more attention to results than the clock. Iâ€™d rather be, and rather hire, that man. Source (via) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmad</title>
		<link>http://www.scottberkun.com/blog/2006/the-manager-thats-never-around/comment-page-1/#comment-4604</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 09:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottberkun.com/blog/?p=218#comment-4604</guid>
		<description>i agree with Alex Shapiro. unfortunately most managers comes out of heavens directly .i have hardly seen managers growing .How come a manager can understand the problems of his workers if he has never been through that time .Most companies prefer to have an alien manager to impress its workforce rather then create a sanctuary to grow managers .How unfortunate ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with Alex Shapiro. unfortunately most managers comes out of heavens directly .i have hardly seen managers growing .How come a manager can understand the problems of his workers if he has never been through that time .Most companies prefer to have an alien manager to impress its workforce rather then create a sanctuary to grow managers .How unfortunate ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Shapiro</title>
		<link>http://www.scottberkun.com/blog/2006/the-manager-thats-never-around/comment-page-1/#comment-3440</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Shapiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 05:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottberkun.com/blog/?p=218#comment-3440</guid>
		<description>This is pretty accurate, but I found the lack of analysis of why managers act that way a bit disappointing.  Chucking it off to â€œprideâ€ is giving too much credit to the managers.  In my and my friends experience managers usually know less then who work under them, and as such they need to create an air of unavailability and intimidation so they wonâ€™t be challenged on anything.  The usual explanation they try to convince themselves of is â€œI see the big picture, I donâ€™t have the time for detailsâ€, but in reality they are just hiding their inadequacy.  I am now working as a manager and try to remain as I was before in regards to my relations with coworkers.  A manager has to have most of the knowledge required for the successful completion of a given project, and hence has to have that knowledge or work harder then his subordinates to acquire it.  As it usually happens, the biggest kiss-ass get the job and everyone suffers, including the project.  I got the promotion only because our management is tight with money and there wasnâ€™t enough time to find a new manager to meet the deadline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is pretty accurate, but I found the lack of analysis of why managers act that way a bit disappointing.  Chucking it off to â€œprideâ€ is giving too much credit to the managers.  In my and my friends experience managers usually know less then who work under them, and as such they need to create an air of unavailability and intimidation so they wonâ€™t be challenged on anything.  The usual explanation they try to convince themselves of is â€œI see the big picture, I donâ€™t have the time for detailsâ€, but in reality they are just hiding their inadequacy.  I am now working as a manager and try to remain as I was before in regards to my relations with coworkers.  A manager has to have most of the knowledge required for the successful completion of a given project, and hence has to have that knowledge or work harder then his subordinates to acquire it.  As it usually happens, the biggest kiss-ass get the job and everyone suffers, including the project.  I got the promotion only because our management is tight with money and there wasnâ€™t enough time to find a new manager to meet the deadline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
