The word innovation is used in so many different ways that I had to sit down recently and categorize them for writerly sanity (An oxymoron for sure). Here’s the short report:
Innovation means:
I’m not saying any of these are right or wrong, only that this is usage I’ve seen. Things get even messier when people talk of innovative organizations (another popular trend). Here, innovation means one of three things:
What does all this mean?
I keep asking the following question: when in the history of business has there been a time when innovation wasn’t important? Never. There has always been competiton and greater rewards for people who could execute on better ideas for things.
If you agree, then why has the term, as fragmented as it has become, grown so popular? and what does this means for popular perception of what innovation is, and how it happens? And did I miss any common uses of the word innovation?
(Note: there should be a law against using a picture of a light-bulb when talking about ideas. Is there a greater innovation cliche? Sigh.)
From my notes on a presentation at SnapStream:
The definition of innovation, according to Peter Drucker, is “Purposeful and focused changes that create new or enhanced potential for creating wealth.”
Hi Scott,
you are right with: “when in the history of business has there been a time when innovation wasn’t important? Never.” But in my opinion that is not the point. Never in history there was more inovation than today (my subjective view ;-). In the past you could win over a competitor when you have a new brilliant idea. Today if you are not producing inovation day by day you are out of business.
In the past someone who build horse carriages had a business that lived for centuries (without great inovations). Today a car manufacturer that always hasn’t the newest technologies will be out of business in just a few years.
So the impact of inovation might be the same, but the frequency changed the game completely…
Ciao Alex
Innovation can also be a double-edged sword. Too much focus on innovation can cause you to miss opportunities in your current business/products. It’s not always necessary to have a new idea. Sometimes it’s better to just do more of what’s already working. Take Starbucks for example. Their stores are vitually the same as they were 15 years ago. They’ve dabbled in innovation but their primary focus has been in multiplying what’s already working for them (building more stores). Every dollar spent on innovation takes a dollar away from opening a new store. So I think innovation is necessary to discover what works but it shouldn’t be placed ahead of capitalizing on what’s already proven to work.
There is a great book not cited yet called “They Made America” by Harold Evans about innovation.
I learned an important lesson reading that book about separating invention and innovation. It’s fabulous to come up with a new idea, but it’s a whole new step to take it into the marketplace successfully. Evan’s points out people who do this really well find a way to systematize. Edison recognized the lite bulb wasn’t going to be very useful unless he lobbied for the right electrical grid. Apple realizes it’s great to have a cleanly designed MP3 player, but it won’t really take off until there is a smooth end-to-end experience, including shopping for music, that the player fits into. My favorite example is actually a guy (name escapes me) who mentions who invents some farming equipment, and realized none of his customers can afford to buy it until they get to use it. He ends up being one of the first pioneers to sell his product on a credit installment plan.
Here’s another data point, Scott. Apologies if you’ve seen it. Doblin lists 10 types of innovation that mostly match your categories.
You might enjoy the book When Old Technologies Were New, by Carolyn Marvin. Since you were asking about historical items recently.
Many people fail to merge “great ideas” with “time to market”. They usually equate innovation with “great ideas” without taking into consideration actual product development. So your article aptly covers all vital aspects of innovation. Well written!
[...] As I’ve covered elsewhere, innovation means something new that’s good, or better than before. I’m not looking for fads or change-for-change-sake gimmicks: but I do want good, clever things you’ve seen other books do that should be emulated, or new ideas you’ve always thought should be part of what a good book is. [...]
Liked the article, How about a new idea concerning the way we work, a slight change may increase revenue overall, could this be Innovation?
[...] your meaning. Innovation is frequently used to mean one of: something new, something better, something new and better, or something that will win. If [...]
[...] why: it doesn’t mean anything anymore. Or more specifically, it means many different things. Unless you are taking the time to make sure everyone is using the word the same way, good [...]
More definitions from wikipedia:
1. the process of making changes to something established by introducing something new
2. the act of introducing something new: something newly introduced (The American Heritage Dictionary).
3. the introduction of something new. (Merriam-Webster Online)
4. a new idea, method or device. (Merriam-Webster Online)
5. the successful exploitation of new ideas (Dept of Trade and Industry, UK).
6. change that creates a new dimension of performance Peter Drucker (Hesselbein, 2002)