<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to write a rude Q&amp;A</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottberkun.com/blog/2007/how-to-write-a-rude-qa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottberkun.com/blog/2007/how-to-write-a-rude-qa/</link>
	<description>Management and Creative Thinking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:35:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rude Q&#38;A &#124; Igniting Startups - nPost</title>
		<link>http://www.scottberkun.com/blog/2007/how-to-write-a-rude-qa/comment-page-1/#comment-632641</link>
		<dc:creator>Rude Q&#38;A &#124; Igniting Startups - nPost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottberkun.com/blog/2007/how-to-write-a-rude-qa/#comment-632641</guid>
		<description>[...] years I&#8217;ve been a fan of Scott Berkun&#8217;s concept of Rude Q&amp;A: What would the meanest, nastiest, but smartest people in the world grill you on when you show your [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] years I&#8217;ve been a fan of Scott Berkun&#8217;s concept of Rude Q&amp;A: What would the meanest, nastiest, but smartest people in the world grill you on when you show your [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rude Q&#38;A : Credit Debt Banking News &#124; CDBN</title>
		<link>http://www.scottberkun.com/blog/2007/how-to-write-a-rude-qa/comment-page-1/#comment-622904</link>
		<dc:creator>Rude Q&#38;A : Credit Debt Banking News &#124; CDBN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottberkun.com/blog/2007/how-to-write-a-rude-qa/#comment-622904</guid>
		<description>[...] years I&#8217;ve been the air blower of Scott Berkun&#8217;s judgment of Rude Q&amp;A: What would the meanest, nastiest, though smartest people in the star griddle we upon when we [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] years I&#8217;ve been the air blower of Scott Berkun&#8217;s judgment of Rude Q&amp;A: What would the meanest, nastiest, though smartest people in the star griddle we upon when we [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Constructive criticism vs. bad business advice</title>
		<link>http://www.scottberkun.com/blog/2007/how-to-write-a-rude-qa/comment-page-1/#comment-592068</link>
		<dc:creator>Constructive criticism vs. bad business advice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottberkun.com/blog/2007/how-to-write-a-rude-qa/#comment-592068</guid>
		<description>[...] The best advice doesn&#8217;t come as a barrage of statements but rather from a series of questions, asked by someone playing devil&#8217;s advocate.Rarely will an adviser know more than you do about your domain of expertise but that doesn&#8217;t mean an outside voice is useless. Pointed questions force you to defend your choices. A healthy debate challenges your assumptions without implying they&#8217;re false. New ideas are batted around as a brainstorm rather than handed down as gospel.In my case, Frank presented his view as a series of statements, axioms even; Gerry couched his perspective as pointed questions that required either rebuttal or agreement.In fact, playing devil&#8217;s advocate is a great exercise to do periodically anyway. Find an intelligent foe, take her to lunch, and follow Scott Berkun&#8217;s advice about Rude Q&amp;A. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The best advice doesn&#8217;t come as a barrage of statements but rather from a series of questions, asked by someone playing devil&#8217;s advocate.Rarely will an adviser know more than you do about your domain of expertise but that doesn&#8217;t mean an outside voice is useless. Pointed questions force you to defend your choices. A healthy debate challenges your assumptions without implying they&#8217;re false. New ideas are batted around as a brainstorm rather than handed down as gospel.In my case, Frank presented his view as a series of statements, axioms even; Gerry couched his perspective as pointed questions that required either rebuttal or agreement.In fact, playing devil&#8217;s advocate is a great exercise to do periodically anyway. Find an intelligent foe, take her to lunch, and follow Scott Berkun&#8217;s advice about Rude Q&amp;A. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
