- February 9th, 2010
- 33 Comments »
- philosophy
Book smarts vs. Street smarts
In a series of posts, called readers choice, I write on whatever topics people submit and vote for. If you dig this idea, let me know in the comments, and submit your ideas and votes.
This week’s reader’s choice post: Book Smarts vs. Street Smarts
Polarizing questions are silly since rarely in life do you have to make such exclusive choices. Often if you’re clever, you can find ways to obtain both ends of any X or Y type dilemma. But for fun, I’ll assume you’ve stolen my lunch money and refuse to give it back until I play along and pick one side.
There is no doubt in my mind street smarts kicks book smarts ass. To be street smart means you have situational awareness. You can assess the environment you are in, who is in it, and what the available angles are. Being on the street, or in the trenches, or whatever low to the ground metaphor you prefer, requires you learn to trust your own judgment about people and what matters. This skill, regardless of where you develop it, is of great value everywhere in life regardless of how far from the streets you are.
Most important perhaps, being street smart comes from experience. It means you’ve learned how to take what has happened to you, good or bad, think about it, and learn to improve from it. The prime distinction between street smarts and book smarts is who is at the center of the knowledge. On the street, it’s you. In a book it’s you trying to absorb someone elses take on the world, and however amazing the writer is, you are at best one degree removed from the actual experience. Street smarts means you’ve put yourself at risk and survived. Or thrived. Or have scars. You’ve been tested and have a bank of courage to depend on when you are tested again. Being street smart can lead to book smarts as the street smart sense what works and what doesn’t, and adapt accordingly.
Book smarts, as I’ve framed it, means someone who is good at following the rules. These are people who get straight A’s, sit in the front, and perhaps enjoy crossword puzzles. They like things that have singular right answers. They like to believe the volume, and precision, of their knowledge can somehow compensate for their lack of experience applying it in the real world. Thinking about things has value, but imagining how you will handle a tough situation is a world away from actually being in one (As Tyler Durden says in Fight Club – “How much can you know about yourself if you’ve never been in a fight?”).
Like the stereotypical ROTC idiot in war movies (e.g. The Thin Red Line, Aliens 2) who outranks the much more competent and experienced, but less well pedigreed sergeant, the book smart confuse pretense with reality, and only learn of the difference when it is too late. Or worse, even after the fact, they insist on seeking out more books and degrees rather than recognizing they are trying to improve the wrong skills: they are half blind by their own choice since they insist on looking at the world with only one eye.
I say all this as someone who has a deep love for books, and who has some degree of what might be called book smarts. But it’s that knowledge, used in service of street smarts, that best explains whatever I’ve achieved so far in life.
If you liked this post, you'll love Mindfire: Big Ideas for Curious Minds, a new best-of collection of Berkun's famous essays and posts from 2000-2011.
Buy now on Amazon.com $8.69 (print / kindle), Barnes & Noble, & iBookstore.
Like this? There's more - Free monthly email
Get the most popular posts each month delivered to your inbox. No hassle, no tricks. (privacy policy)
Subscribe
About Scott Berkun
I'm the author of three bestselling books.
I write about ideas and how they work.
More about me and what I do here.
Subscribe to this blog
Follow on Twitter
Facebook page
Connect on LinkedIn
Ask a question in email
Scott's Books
- (NEW) Mindfire: Big Ideas for Curious Minds
- The definitive best of collection of provocative essays and entertaining posts from over a decade of great writing, curated into one amazing little book.
- Buy on Amazon / Sample (PDF)
- Confessions of a
Public Speaker - Behind-the-scenes tales from the life of a successful public speaker, teaches how to be a great communicator. Recommended by the WSJ, lifehacker, Wired and more.
- Buy on Amazon / Sample
- The Myths of Innovation
(New Paperback edition) - As discussed on CNBC, MSNBC and NPR, entertains and frees you from the myths of creativity. Teaches patterns & lessons for bringing ideas into the world. Updated edition w/4 new chapters.
- Buy on Amazon / Sample (pdf)
- Making Things Happen
- The bestselling handbook for any project manager, revised and updated, packed with tactics, stories and leadership lessons from the trenches.
- Buy on Amazon
33 thoughts on “Book smarts vs. Street smarts”
Motely Fool has an article on this – focuses on going to college as the criteria for being book smart which is perhaps narrower than mine. But does have some interested examples from the CEO ranks. The other downside is the focus on the TV show The Apprentice, a show, like many other reality TV shows, that emphasizes the asshole approach to getting ahead.
Unfortunately you are contradicting yourself at the end of your statement…
“it
Josh: It’s hard to contradict yourself when you don’t entirely buy the premise, which I admitted early on :)
But to defend the position I did choose to take, if I could only have one, it’d be street smarts. I think I have better odds of deriving what I would get from books through other means, than the other way around. I can’t prove this, but I do believe it.
Pingback: Dew Drop – February 10, 2010 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew
I think this is a bit different. I work with many street-smart people and they have some blind zones that they are not aware of. They follow other rules: their own, and they are inflexible about that. If you expose to repetitive patterns you began to believe that this experiences is the reality, and you are less aware of the now famous “black swans”.
Book-smart people can have less experience, but they have a map of the world. An incorrect map, but one made by thousands of contributions that have been verified. This knowledge have a limit, but it’s much better because you know where you are and what is around you. Of course, this map can be outdated, but you can violate the rules when you think it’s necessary.
There are genius in both camps, but you need both kinds of knowledge.
Geeks like to reduce every problem to a few variables, but this doesn’t work. This is the reason why personnel selection process doesn’t always work.
Jose: that’s a sound argument. Thanks for making it.
You’ve made me think there’s something else that’s more important in both cases and that’s the capacity to admit there is more going on that your realize.
Or put another way, you can read a book or live on the streets and learning nothing in either case. The ability to extract knowledge from experience, or from books, is the important thing.
It’s also worth noting that which books you read makes a huge difference on what you might learn, just as which streets you choose to hang out on matters.
Jose – A better question your post made me think of:
How do you find your blind spots? And what do you do about it?
This is perhaps a much better question and prediction of who you’ll become than the book smarts vs. street smarts thing.
Well, put yourself in difficult situations. Most people kills for opportunities to learn. I know of people who prefer a job where they will learn to a well paid but boring job.
I don’t believe in genious, it’s impossible that so many good musician live in the same period of time near Viena. And it’s impossible that so many good programmers/developers/startup-founders live in the SF Bay Area in USA.
It’s constant growing opportunities and learning from great experiences what make this possible. If you live in a country or work in a company without exciting new problems you will not learn anything, because constant knowledge, being complex or not, will be accumulated by some persons and they will not share it, living in silos, as it’s a source of power.
This reminds me something I read from a neuroscientist. He said that if you want to experiment a long live (to feel as if every day it’s important and long) you must constantly learn new things because the brain “compiles” routinary things and you feel as if times run too quickly.
If you have worked in domains out of computing, you will learn that there are many complex domains where knowledge silos are not accesibles. I’m now in the global commerce domain and it’s really incredible how many things you must know to move goods from one port to another. Just to move a container through a custom require from you all your knowledge.
I’m taking a good course on that, and many people there are street-smarts. They all have good stories about incredible things, and give really good tips and tricks about that world. But then you need the book smarts to know about international agreements, laws and so.
It’s the same in every domain.
Good article and points. I also agree with Jose. I feel that you need to know both in order to recognize opportunities or traps. In my corp job, I see high level managers miss huge things because they cannot think outside of their limited training – and I also see street smart players who can’t play the game long enough to win or carve their own path.
I personally want to know what rainbow sorbet tastes like in order to know I prefer chocolate. Not just read about it.
Thanks !
Great post, however, one thing you don’t touch on is that street smarts are only really obtained by first hand knowledge – i.e. that which has happened directly to you or what you’ve seen happen to those around you.
My mother always taught me that life is too short to learn everything from your own mistakes. You need to learn from everyone else’s too.
Book smarts are the lessons learned from many other people’s fortunes, insights and mistakes – in a shorter amount of time than I could possibly learn them all myself.
Street smarts allows you to see and understand which of those lessons should be heeded, which can be ignored and those which aren’t really lessons at all, but red herrings, distractions and outright fabrications.
I would have a hard time choosing one from the other, because without book smarts, I’d have to learn everything for myself first hand which is a long and arduous journey. But without street smarts, especially with the advent of the internet and the masses of complete garbage that comes with it, I’d be learning a lot of false lessons unnecessarily and wasting a lot of valuable time.
Thus, there is no useful way to separate one from the other when you’re applying them to the real world.
Well, to start with, I would rather prefer to be a book smart than a streetsmart. Street smart is not a choice; it is something you are exposed upon, forced to live and you survived with all your zeal and courage. A street smart never starts with the will to be a streetsmart. Generally it is his destiny which brings him there.
But I agree, that to excel a book smart needs to go down to road and try to match his knowledge with all hands-on skill. And the combination of both can take you to the pinnacle.
Pingback: Dew Drop – February 11, 2010 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew
“who is at the center of the knowledge”
That’s super, Scott.
I agree that, if I had to choose one or the other, I’ll take experience over books (and I say that as a guy who’s written four and has four in the works, and reads about one a week.)
But, we don’t have to choose, for ourselves at least. If you’re hiring, yeah; there are a lotta people with a piece of paper but no experience. Not a tough call for me.
For myself, I read books to see what they have to teach me, but as you say, I do it with myself in the center. If someone teaches something that I know is ‘wrong’, I’m not likely to change my mind.
If I experience something totally contrary to what I believe, you’d best believe it’s got my full attention.
Pingback: Street Smarts Kick Book Smarts A$$ « Always 2nd in charge…until now.
In my experience, the bottom line here is that the only way to really learn is to make mistakes, and the only way to make mistakes is to try shit and fail. You can’t fail while reading something in a book or listening to someone tell you something, and thus you can’t make mistakes, and consequently can’t learn.
Pingback: Ruling Imagination: Law and Creativity » Blog Archive » Street Smarts, Book Smarts, and Making them Work Together
To me, book smarts allow for strategic thinking. Street smarts are tactical, here and now. It’s a different mindset for an entirely different class of problem.
Ideally, you want both together, but that isn’t always possible. As some of the other commentators have said, book smarts give you a map, street smarts don’t.
Also, book smarts tell you when to apply those street smarts. Street smartness is highly contextual, and outside that context, they lose big.
Pingback: Street Smarts and the Proud Mom Test
It seems that there is no one key to success in life. Academic knowledge and intellectual ability certainly play a big part in the foundation of a successful career. But it also requires vision, charisma, a good work ethic, and not a bit of intuition to pull everything together. Success is not behind just one door. It’s behind several doors, and series of doors, so you’re going to need more than one key.
I saw this quote the other day: “Every time I encounter someone saying that they aren’t ‘book smart’ but they are ‘street smart’, I always hear, ‘I’m not real smart, but I’m imaginary smart.’”
Very true.
Your article only exemplifies anti-intellectualism.
What you describe as street smarts is really just another byproduct of having high general intelligence.
Any distinction between ‘street smarts’ which is just what people with low intelligence call ‘wisdom’ and ‘book smarts’ which is just what people with low intelligence use to refer to the more apparent features of people with high intelligence is a totally arbitrary one and exists only to give the common idiot a way out of facing his shortcomings.
In short, you are an idiot and you know it. Not that deep down either. You resent people who aren’t idiots. All you’re trying to do is bring them down to your level by acting like their possession of something implies their lack of something else.
Sad really. Not just how little intelligence and the brain are understood by sheep like you. But how bitter your ilk are about having such weak intellects.
@ David Bandel
I think the article is right on and I think it is good to have both. But any successful person will tell you that they had to get out there and *try* and make mistakes, while others were caught in “analysis paralysis”. I’ve always been well rounded and have done many things, and I am a massive, massive reader. One of the biggest around. At the end of the day, I wouldn’t trade my resourcefulness and real world skills. Things they *don’t* teach in school. People who live at their own devices are sheep? People in school are trained to be sheep and keep the middle class going. They follow the crowd and do what the world tells them they should do.
I started my own company and paid for my own schooling, and I’m glad to be finished. To see people take out staggering amounts of loans for something they think will bring them the “easy life” and it won’t more often than not is sad. Intelligence is a broad concept and a key of intelligence is the ability to adapt, and guess what. Those with street smarts adapt faster because they are able to change their way of thinking to adapt to their situation, where “book smart” people tend to fall into line and do what the world tells them. I’m blessed to have the street smarts to make my own way, and the book smarts to help advance me.
I have a friend who believes in everything the book tells him although he has very little real world experience. He takes the word of a book as the gospel truth and he’ll be the guy who goes back to school and gets several degrees to avoid facing the real world. A world carved by others.
There is no map when you have street smarts because you have to carve your own way. I prefer the path less taken because it is more rewarding. I am an entrepreneur myself and I know that there’s no map for the path I take, whereas most “book smart” people go for security. Hence the saying “A students work for C students”. It’s not the “smarts” per se, it’s the mindset. One likes a controlled environment with a “right answer” and a “wrong answer” and the other likes to make their own way. Grades or not, it has a valid point and why some of the worlds most successful people dropped out of school or didn’t finish or didn’t do good in it. They were making their own way.
I peronally believe book smarts and street smarts are both extremely important in being sucessful in life. Street smarts helps you deal with conflicts, but book smarts is having a strong base of knowledge. Which also is very important. Personally I belive that street smart is much more important to have than book smart. Yes knowing facts is cool, but in real life situations you need to be able to roll with the punches and deal with obstacles put in front of you. Another point is when you’re working for any company you’re almost always working with other people and I personally enjoy working with people who are street smart. Please give me your opinion. Who would you enjoy working with more?
Street smarts are often overlooked by the “geniuses” of the world. Take a surgeon for example. He/she will spend years in med school learning procedure after procedure, simply because that’s what they must know to excel at their job. But if you throw that surgeon into the real world, in a tough situation. They’ll most likely look for the way out by analyzing the situation for logical key points, then use that point to try to make a move based on what another author or published has told them. This way of thinking in the real world isn’t the most helpful for there are too many variables that may throw the situation into a whole direction at any moment in time. In order to get prosper you need to be able to adapt to these variables and make a decision or move based on what may happen or what will happen. This knowledge is mostly and more easily gained when using street smarts.
I believe that street smart and book smart are both important assets in life. Life experiences are more active and hands on but school education can teach you in different ways.
Hello, sup Tanner. In response to your question, I’d much rather be a book smart person. And I am. As a highschool student, I am studying the average, boring ciriculum… so I can go on to college, and probably find some job rotting in an office… living the life of that guy from Office Space. Sure, I won’t enjoy it, but you know what? That’s what’s considered normal and successful. What can you do with street smarts unless you are from the inner city where you need to know how to react when you are ambushed by muggers? Im a suburban kid, and therefore I have no need for streetsmarts.
John Smith, I believe that both book smart and street smart are important assets in life. Your example of a surgeon can not support this because if a surgeon is only basing things off of street smart they really have nothing. If they go to work on a pacient and they only have street smarts then they may know some things but they will not be able to do their best in getting that pacient to a well being. If they only have street smart then you are risking the pacients life. Therefore people need street smart and book smart.
Shelly,
You’re putting words in my mouth. I completely agree with what you’re saying and that’s the point I was trying to get through. He/she would have the book smarts to keep a paitent in a good state. But their street smarts or real worl experiences would be lacking.
patient*
Jack, street smarts aren’t needed for avoiding muggers thats what guns are for. Being in an office you definetly need streetsmarts. When doing buissness things never go as planed and when you make a mistake if you learn from it next time an obstacle is put in your way you’ll know how to deal with those problems more easily. For example as a highschool student when you have a new teacher and your about to take your first test from them you don’t know if you should prepare for the test by studying short answer questions, essay questions, or multiple choice questions. After you take your first test you’ll know what their tests are like and you should be more sucessful on your next test. Also school doesn’t teach you how to deal with problems. Life expirience does.
Wait! Unless they are math problems, Tanner.
Boom Roasted.
when a person himself always trying to put as a book smart in his society he is always being ignored by the street smarts.really book smarts are always trying to find answers from the life, at last its being all gets complicated.so i think after getting knowledge every book smart has to put it practically in the society to adjust himself.