Recently The Royal Society put their copy of the best evidence in the world about the fabled story of Newton watching an apple fall up on the web. NPR picked up the story here.
In my besteller, the Myths of Innovation, I spend a chapter exploring the failings of the story, and others like it, and how misused these tales often are.
But I have doubts this event ever took place. The book The Royal Society posted was titled Memoirs of Isaac Newton, written by his friend William Stukeley.
Here are the facts:
In James Glieck’s excellent biography, Isaac Newton, he strongly suggests Newton offered the story as an metaphoric anecdote, as way to express his curiosity about the world, rather than as a literal tale about specific singular moment that redefined his view of things.
(for Americans: the bit about getting hit on the head was added much later, as often happens with myths. And it appeared in Schoolhouse rock).
Now my point here is not to say epiphanies never happen. Most creative people have them now and then, and I do too (but I argue they are overrated and do not eliminate the hard work and risk that follows them. Newton worked for a decade to complete his theory on gravity that he became famous for). I’m also not questioning Newton’s genius – he was one. But reasonable doubt about this legend is warranted given the extremely thin evidence we have.
Frankly I don’t trust Stukeley. He was apparently a good friend of Newton’s. Just as I wouldn’t trust a biographer/friend interviewing someone famous late in their life, who somehow manages to tell only them a story about something that happened decades ago, that the famous person never mentioned in any of their own extensive journals and writings or interviews with other people. I can guess Stukeley wanted Newton to look good. He also wanted his book to be read (though the publishing history of the memoir is unclear). And in the spirit of those two things some exaggeration of facts and conversion of abstract anecdotes into real specific events would not be surprising.
In an article at The Independent, one of the few pieces this week to do research at all, offers this report from an expert at the Royal Society, which owns the manuscript:
“Newton cleverly honed this anecdote over time,” said Keith Moore, head of archives at the Royal Society. “The story was certainly true, but let’s say it got better with the telling.” The story of the apple fitted with the idea of an Earth-shaped object being attracted to the Earth. It also had a resonance with the Biblical account of the tree of knowledge, and Newton was known to have extreme religious views, Mr Moore said.
Newton had a huge ego and was kind of a jerk. This is undisputed. A living legend telling exaggerated tales about things that happened decades ago seems possible.
I’m surprised that in the history of science so few people have raised any questions at all.
I’d love to see the web help me round out the facts, find experts and other familiar with the sources. Spread the word.
You’re wrong about one thing. Epiphanies are the only true source of original human thought. You cannot systematically approach innovation. I’m sure that Newton had an epiphany with regard to the universal inverse square law he posited applied to gravity.
What’s most important about Newton’s no doubt fictitious apple is that it is popular science which is a fabulous combination.
Jan: I obviously disagree, as I wrote a whole book largely attempting to use evidence and researched history to show how epiphany is overstated in its value, and over-represented in actually stories of successful invention.
On what evidence is your claim based? What inventor’s journals or memoirs focus on the importance of epiphanies in their work? It’s often PR and journalists who emphasize these stories, or inventors interested in PR.
Another interesting thing is that Newton developed calculus to solve the problems of mechanics and gravitation, but when he published his theory of gravitation, he recast the proofs to use more conventional geometric arguments involving conics, and kept calculus jealously to himself. Newton was not above dissimulation and artifice.
Gottfried Leibniz independently reinvented calculus, but unlike Newton, he published it, leading to a century-long controversy over who really invented it.
I believe the verdict on calculus was that they invented it independently of each other, but Newton did it first (although as you say, he hadn’t shared it with the world).
Newton was very private about many of his studies, especially alchemy. Gleick’s biography is really fantastic and concise – I wish I had read that book before some of the others.
Some more tidbits here, although varying in certainty:
I think my final verdict is, I really don’t care if the apple event really happened.
I don’t think Newton had the kind of mind that needed an apple to suggest gravity. I suspect he had the kind of mind that wanted a dumbed down story to help explain the concept to mere mortals.
[...] story sounds great, there are many who doubt its authenticity, including Scott Berkin who wrote an excellent book on the Myths of Innovation: Now my point here is not to say epiphanies never happen. Most creative people have them now and [...]
Interesting thoughts. Thanks, Scott. There have been studies on the total failings of eyewitness accounts, and how memory on it’s own is about the worst memory strategy we have.
(I am inclined to point out to those who haven’t read Stukeley’s manuscript that he wrote Newton told him he was considering a falling apple when he started to wonder about the concept of why things fell inward. The ‘apple-on-the-head part’ was never brought up by Newton or Stukeley.)