Recently The Royal Society put their copy of the best evidence in the world about the fabled story of Newton watching an apple fall up on the web. NPR picked up the story here.
In my besteller, the Myths of Innovation, I spend a chapter exploring the failings of the story, and others like it, and how misused these tales often are.
But I have doubts this event ever took place. The book The Royal Society posted was titled Memoirs of Isaac Newton, written by his friend William Stukeley.
Here are the facts:
In James Glieck’s excellent biography, Isaac Newton, he strongly suggests Newton offered the story as an metaphoric anecdote, as way to express his curiosity about the world, rather than as a literal tale about specific singular moment that redefined his view of things.
(for Americans: the bit about getting hit on the head was added much later, as often happens with myths. And it appeared in Schoolhouse rock).
Now my point here is not to say epiphanies never happen. Most creative people have them now and then, and I do too (but I argue they are overrated and do not eliminate the hard work and risk that follows them. Newton worked for a decade to complete his theory on gravity that he became famous for). I’m also not questioning Newton’s genius – he was one. But reasonable doubt about this legend is warranted given the extremely thin evidence we have.
Frankly I don’t trust Stukeley. He was apparently a good friend of Newton’s. Just as I wouldn’t trust a biographer/friend interviewing someone famous late in their life, who somehow manages to tell only them a story about something that happened decades ago, that the famous person never mentioned in any of their own extensive journals and writings or interviews with other people. I can guess Stukeley wanted Newton to look good. He also wanted his book to be read (though the publishing history of the memoir is unclear). And in the spirit of those two things some exaggeration of facts and conversion of abstract anecdotes into real specific events would not be surprising.
In an article at The Independent, one of the few pieces this week to do research at all, offers this report from an expert at the Royal Society, which owns the manuscript:
“Newton cleverly honed this anecdote over time,” said Keith Moore, head of archives at the Royal Society. “The story was certainly true, but let’s say it got better with the telling.” The story of the apple fitted with the idea of an Earth-shaped object being attracted to the Earth. It also had a resonance with the Biblical account of the tree of knowledge, and Newton was known to have extreme religious views, Mr Moore said.
Newton had a huge ego and was kind of a jerk. This is undisputed. A living legend telling exaggerated tales about things that happened decades ago seems possible.
I’m surprised that in the history of science so few people have raised any questions at all.
I’d love to see the web help me round out the facts, find experts and other familiar with the sources. Spread the word.
Spolsky’s latest piece is about Brook’s law, and how adding people to projects can make them worse.
For those unfamiliar, Brook’s law states that when you add a person, you geometricly increase the amount of communication people of the project have to do, suggesting it’s a bad idea.
While I agree with the law, there are important exceptions I’ve identified - depending who the person in question is (elite or bozo), how good they are at jumping in tough territory (ninja or bozo), and how much they already know about the project (familiar or bozo newbie).
Spolsky’s points are generally sound, but I believe there’s a deeper cause for overcommunication.
The reason committees suck is authority is distributed across a large number of people. This makes everyone feel like everyone needs to know about everything. And worse, people fight in the backroom to obtain control over the committee, so the visible authority and real authority can be far apart.
Overcommunication is a symptom of lack of clarity over power. If you want better communication, clarify the following:
This sets everyone’s expectations for who needs to know what. It reduces endless forwarding of fyi material on the hopes someone might need it.
The person with decision making authority should be collaborating with others, and can delegate their authority, but no one should ever be confused that they have the power to make the call.
45 people can not effectively make a decision together. But 44 people can council one wise, empowered person to make a more effective decision.
Like Spolsky, I agree things would be better if there were 5 people in the room, instead of 45, but the clear distribution of power is the problem I’d solve first.
This post, according to wordpress, is #952. I have about 50 more to go to hit the 1000 mark.
Since my posts tend towards new material, rather than just a link and a sentence, this is a shitload of words.
I’m grateful to all the folks who subscribe, read, forward, comment and even snark here, as this blog has been a critical part of my successful independent life so far.
I’d like to do something fun here when I hit post #1000. Open to suggestions – leave ‘em in the comments. Thanks.
Vijay recently asked in the comments on a recent talk:
Thank you for a great presentation. I noticed that your energy was explosive and there was absolutely no point in the presentation where I could detect a lull. I am interested in learning if you have any secrets or techniques in maintaining the focus of not just the audience, but also yourself as I often space out even when I am working on something that I am passionate about.
Explosive energy makes me think of being a drummer in Spinal Tap. Perhaps I should tone it down.
There are four things going on.
Hope that helps. Let me know if it doesn’t.
For reference, here’s me speaking at Ignite:
These were up on the amazon.com page as a special promotion, but amazon took them down recently.
Here they are:
Chapter 2 – Attack of the Butterflies
Chapter 3 – $30,000 an hour
So if you’ve seen me speak, and wonder “is his writing as good as his speaking”, now you can find out for free :)
I try very hard to make my books, and presentations, different things so experiencing one doesn’t ruin the experience of the other. I really hate seeing someone speak, buy their book, and then realize I already heard all the good stuff. I try very hard to make each thing stand alone.
Here are these week’s links: